Ancient Kings of Britain PART 2
Important
Move pointer(LH button down) slowly OVER images for maximum effectiveness...Agendums may be codified for black-op pre-emptiveness..:-)..These pages carry "hidden messages"..When the pointer moves over an image it shows the hidden message which Mozilla does not do(blame W3C)...so there is an "add-on" for Firefox,Netscape 7 and Mozilla alternate image..Please go Here to download the open source add-on..It only takes a second and its well worth it....Troedyrhiw
When will the director’s, historians and so-called archaeologists wake up and put two and two together? What are they paid for anyway?
Isn’t it their job and responsibility to inform the public of the truth and how it all came to be?
Isn’t there anyone who gets a nice fat salary from the government game enough to stand up and admit the truth? Why do they leave the public to work this out for themselves?.I doubt it in this day and age; some would lie out of their eyeteeth rather than lose a lucrative job with a promise of a pension on retirement.
I always knew that King Llud had started London. When I worked at Fleet Street as a youth, there used to be a statue of King Llud and his sons situated at Ludgate Circus as a memorial to King Llud who was one of the principle founders of Londinium.....
King Lud and his two sons...Click for Larger Image...See Footnote 3
King Lud and his two sons...Click for Larger Image
It appears Llud’s statue and his wall has had a turbulent career over the centuries. During King John’s reign when he was forced to sign the Magna Charta, riots broke out in London. The Jewish quarter in Ludgate was stormed and materials were taken to restore the damage done to the walls. Year’s later evidence of this was found when stones bearing Hebrew characters were discovered in the masonry of the gate... See footnote 1
In 1260, during the reign of Henry III the gate was again adorned with the statues of Llud and his two sons,Androgeus, (Arfarwy) and Tenuantius. During the reign of Edward VI, for some reason the population took a dislike to all images and decapitated the heads off of the statues. These were eventually restored by Queen Mary.
However during the reign of Queen Elizabeth the first, the gate was taken down and completely rebuilt with the statues being moved over to the eastern side of the gate. In 1990 the City of London and Ludgate underwent a major redevelopment of the area.
The bridge that carried the underground railway was removed and trains diverted underground. Llud’s statues were also moved to St.Dustan’s in the west,just up the road from Fleet Street near the law courts. It can be found in an alcove of the old church via the side entrance, which is often hard to see as the gates are often locked. I think Llud’s statue should be removed and installed in the care of the Museum of London where it might even be restored to its original condition.
Brutus was the originally founder of the capitol city of Lloegres on the north side of the River Thames and he called it Troia Newydd, meaning,“New Troy”, this is documented in the Brut Tysylio and on many websites on the Internet if you want to check it out yourself.
Geoffrey of Monmouth in his Latin translation became Troia Nova,which was later corrupted into Trinovantium.
Nennius also calls London Trinovantium and says that, “Caesar fought a battle against the British near a place called Trinovantium. Caesar also writes that this battle was fought by the only ford available on the Thames, at the Island of Thorns, which is now Westminister.
Trinovantium has to be no other place than London.
Much is known about King Llud or Llud AP Beli Mawr AP Manogan, he started, his reign in 72 BC, seventeen years before the Romans even came to Britain. He was the regional King of the North Thames area.He is reputed to have been a very powerful leader owning many cities and castles. He also had a reputation of being a mighty warrior in battle.
Llud had a very powerful brother called Cassivellaunus (Casswallon) which was corrupted into Casswallon who reigned from 58-38 BC.
Llud also knew of the importance of building defenses and as Troia Newydd (London) was one of his favorite places he did in fact fortify it.
Belinus, Llud’s father is said to have been building a large wall eight foot thick at its foundations out of stone and limestone.
During Llud’s childhood he would have spent many days with his father whilst he was building the great wall and would continue the work long after his fathers death. The wall was reputed to be over twenty feet high and enclosed a large area protecting the city from any invaders.
According to the Brut Tysylio and other traditional histories King Llud is credited with building a huge wall made out of lime and stone around the city which was eight foot thick at its base. Apparently this wall enclosed an area of 324 acres and was claimed to have been there before the Boadacea rebellion in AD 60.
He also built huge towers and in the west part of the wall built this huge gate. Once it was complete Llud ordered that the gate be named after him hence the name Ludgate which is still used today. This again is documented in the Mabinogion.This proves that the Mabinogian is telling the truth and not the myths,fairy tales and porky pies, as some completely uneducated individuals would like us all to believe.
There were many gates built on the wall, the place names remain to this day, Aldgate, Highgate, Ludgate, Newgate, Billingsgate, named after Llud’s father Beli Mawr, Bishops gate and Cripplegate to name a few.
It is possible that some of these were added onto the great wall after Lud's death.
In Guildhall there are very old engravings of what were the ten gates that allowed entrance to the great city.
The Guildhall
Priory Gate and Church Tower
Lincoln-Inn Gate and Chancery Lane Gate
LudGate and NewGate
Bishops Gate and Cripple Gate
Alders Gate and Bridge Gate
Llud’s father King Heli (Beli Mawr in the Welsh) ruled for forty years until 73 BC,during which time he continued to build great buildings in London and passed on his building skills to his son Llud who became king. It appears that although Llud is given much credit for building London, it was a continuing process of development started by Bruta’s and continued through the ages. Just as development and re-development has continued within the city of London to the present day.
Not much of the great wall that Llud built is left standing although there is much of it to be seen still around a few places in London.
Starting out at Tower Hill almost directly opposite the Tower itself and beside the underground tube station is one section still to be see about twenty five feet high and some 80 yards in length.
Brutus Wall near Trinity Place London..Click to Enlarge
London Tower Hill..Brutus Wall...Click to Enlarge
Just around the corner from the station is the Grand hotel, which has two flaming torches outside the main building. In the car park next to the main entrance one can see another 100-foot section of the wall, which has been decorated with lights and is more colourful to photograph. What is interesting here is the fact that at the wall, which is fenced off, is split between the car park and basement below. One can see down into the basement and the size of the actual foundations of the wall.
They are as already stated and written down throughout time and history about eight foot thick. Although this is claimed to be a Roman Wall, it fits the descriptions already written many centuries ago and there is no doubt that this wall was built by Llud as was written. The Romans may of repaired and extended sections of the wall during their occupation, but they were not the initial architects and builders of the wall.
Even more astounding is the fact that this hotel is redeveloping a site next door having bought the site they now intend to expand with this added extension.Now the interesting thing is that they have an archaeologist on the site because the builders have come across the foundations of another section of the wall once more.
BRUTUS WALL ON NOBLE STREET LONDON.See rect/square Plaque in Centre of Image.Click to Enlarge
Although, I wasn’t allowed to take photographs the hole the builders had already dug was a good thirty to forty feet below street level.When you add another twenty to thirty feet of the wall above street level, the height of the actual wall could have been forty to fifty feet high in its day.It would also have been a really massive sight to behold and would have presented many problems for anyone wanting to take London by storm.
There are more sections of the wall still visible for the general public to see especially around Barbican near the Museum of London and surrounding streets.
...RUINS OF THE BARBICAN ON LUDGATE HILL??...Click to Enlarge...See Footnote 2 below
It is claimed that not far from Ludgate, Llud also built himself a fine palace, which is the Bishop of London’s palace.
What all this really means is that London was by its size the largest city not only in Britain but also in the whole of Europe.
If this is so then we have a motive for Caesars greed to take such a prize.
King Llud is also said to have been the first person to have measured Briton from top to bottom and coast to coast.
Llud had sons, so there must have been a woman in his life, sadly I have been unable to come up with the name of such a woman, it may well be that Llud had a number of ladies he shared his affections with.
Apart from building a palace for himself, Llud also invited others to build many fine houses within his walls that he had built. Hmmmm, now just a cotton-picking minute, who were the people that stated the Briton’s lived in wooden thatched huts? Here, we have a direct statement of fine palaces being built and lived in.
It is precisely at this point that the Academics will start ranting and raving that the wall was built by the Romans, but was it? Now start putting your thinking caps on kiddiewinks and start reading about the Trojan war and how the Trojans were able to hold out against the armies of Greece for Ten Years. Brutus and his men would have realized the importance of defenses and would have taken measures to ensure they were well protected, they certainly had many years prior to Caesar's visit to construct it.
Didn’t a huge wall protect Troy too? The Greek Army tried hard enough to get inside the huge wall and only gained entrance by using the famous Trojan horse.
Surely someone with Brutus would have known about the importance of walls keeping out the enemy? We are not talking about wild uneducated savages here, these were well-educated individuals who had seen and experienced beautiful palaces with marble columns and floors and knew how to protect themselves too.
Brutu's even married a Greek Princess, for god's sake she lived in style in palaces befitting her stature and rank. Her own father would not have lived in a mere shack so why would she?
Are these so called academics taught nothing or is that what they are told to preach? Sometimes it is better not to be educated and know something than to be
educated and know nothing.
They had a fluent knowledge of the Greek language, the Roman historians tell us, and so does Strabo. So why wouldn’t they also have a knowledge of building fine palaces? Even in Llud’s day London was a very busy city where merchants provided and sold merchandise from many countries including much Mediterranean produce.
In fact, there are several mentions that the Kings of Britain not only lived in fine palaces but used marble and had mosaic tiles floors with intricate designs placed on them too.
The British Museum has a fine example with the Christian religious symbol of Chi Rho featured plainly on it. Only a very brave man and powerful leader would have had such on the floor or walls of his house. Although, it is credited with being Roman, it is highly probable and not impossible that this came from one of the palaces that were once owned by a ruling King of Britain as it was there religion.
Even after the Claudian invasion, the Roman’s, although they might have tried to convert the British to Christianity gave up and never intervened in the British way of religion. The Roman’s had too many gods whilst the British only had one in which to put their faith in.
This explains why the Chi Rho mosaic now on prominent view to the public in the British Museum was allowed to be situated where it was and tolerated by the Roman’s, if they ever saw it?
The truth is the great wall of London had already been built when the Roman’s arrived and whilst they may of built onto and added to it and maybe repaired it in certain places they alone did not build it, the British did so it is high time this was recognized and renamed Llud's wall, who is named as the architect in so many documents.
PART OF LONDON,SHOWING THE ANCIENT WALL..Click to Enlarge....Note the number of Gates(10) surround the City of London..They are shown as double pillars..Check their names if possible
Not everything that the British Museum states has to be correct.This is because they refuse to recognize anything that might be British or something they simply do not understand.Therefore they make these wild assumptions about it possibly being Roman or Saxon without even considering other possibilities.
I will give credit where it is due, I admire the honesty of the curator of the Museum of London who gave me detailed information regarding the statues of King Llud. I was hoping the Museum would place the statue in the museum in order for its future preservation and for the people. Some historians do have a genuine interest in the British Kings.
How many treasures in the museum connected to the Roman’s are or were originally British? Who would know for sure? As the Briton’s would have adopted Greek as well as Roman architecture before the Romans did gain a foothold.
The question remains, how many British building were mistaken as being Roman? No one in the Museum can give a definite answer to the question, and no one would dare answer it.
One cannot lay the blame on the staff and everyone working for museums. They are the guardians of the nations treasures. Unfortunately politics and politicians lay down the guidelines of what can and what cannot be stated. The same as what is acceptable to be taught in Britain's schools.
The Brut Tysylio and the Mabinogian state that Brutus who was a great great grandson of Aeneas originally founded London. Brutus died after a memorial reign of twenty-four years and was interred by the side of Imogene on the Bryn Gwyn (the White Mount). Which is believed to have been where the Tower of London now stands or in that area.
After the destruction of Troy around 1,200 B.C., Aeneas, born of a royal bloodline fled with the remnants of his people and settled in Italy. There he married the daughter of Latinus, the king of the Latin’s, and through this line later emerged the Roman Empire.
The grandson of Aeneas, a man called Brutus,had to flee Italy when he accidentally killed his father on a hunting trip.
He arrived in Greece, on discovery of his royal lineage,dispossessed Trojans flocked to his command. He eventually married the daughter of the Greek king. He then commandeered a fleet and was visited by the goddess Diana and was sent to sail west until he found a land where his people would live in peace.
Brutus eventually reached the isle of Albion, landing at Totnes in Cornwall. He eventually founded the city of Trinovantum (New Troy), or Caer Troia as the Britons called it,around 1000 B.C. the city was dedicated to the goddess Diana by Brutus and he founded a temple to her.
Diabolical as it might sound to some, this is well documented and references to Brutas and his discoveries can be found all over the internet so this is not a figment of my imagination it is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but.
There are web sites that anyone can even trace the origins of people right back to Adam and Eve if you have the inclination and time to look for them. Knowledge in this day and age is so important if we are to find our real roots and who we really are.
King Llud (73 BC) re-named it "Caer-Llud" (Llud’s Town). It later became known as London. When Llud died, he was buried near a gateway called Ludgate.
The re-naming of the city has been a disaster for British history.Not only have we forgotten our links with ancient Troy, but we have also given ground to the advocates of evolution,who don't want us to know that, through the Trojans, we can trace our ancestry all the way back to Noah. For the skeptics, Troy was found by Hienrich Schlieman a noted German archaeologist. There is no excuse for
historians or anyone to say Troy was a myth and did not exist.
Now, this is where a very strange modern day treasure find comes into the story. Towards the end of 2003 British television station channel four screened a new series of finds made in Britain by metal detectorists called, “Hidden Treasure”.
In one of the series of programs someone had found a large collection of coins. To make the program more interesting an archaeological dig took place.
It was during the dig that a huge quantity of bones were uncovered and on forensic testing they were found to be animal bones indicating that a huge feast had taken place at one time.
In those days a battle would be fought during the day and they would collect their dead and bury them during the night. It was more like something out of a loony tunes cartoon where Wiley Coyote would clock on in the morning for his shift while Ralph the devoted watch dog would stand guard over the flock of sheep during the day only to clock off at night fall.
After the fighting when the battle had been fought and won a great feast was held, this might not be in one spot alone but in many different towns and settlements.
The Welsh triads record that Caswallon ordered the slaughter of 120,000 animals for a great feast to celebrate the victory. With the discovery of the huge number of animal bones that were found by accident following an archaeological dig on a site where coins were found buried, it shows that the triads are true and more attention should be given to them for their accuracy.
Why, I asked again, did none of the archaeologists or historians at the British Museum connect this find to what happened in AD 55? Maybe, they stubbornly refuse to recognize these old documents which far from telling myths and fairy tales are telling the truth about what happened in the so call dark ages. It is high time that these so called academics paid more attention to these writings and old documents.
Many years ago I wrote an article about my travels to the British Museum in which I mentioned the Sutton Hoo burial ship and how the guides considered it to be Anglo Saxon. They even gave the name of the supposed King that had been buried in it as Raedwald.
Sticking my nose in where it wasn’t wanted I suggested to the guide that the helmets could have belonged to King Arthur? The Romans described the Britons as being clean-shaven and having moustaches the same as depicted on the helmets?
This helmet ABOVE-Artists Representaton
Those two famous helmets, one for use in battle and one for ceremonial purposes can only describe the person wearing them as being clean shaven and having a moustache, exactly as described by Roman writers.
Could there have been a misdating of the burial? Look at the items found in the ship? Is that not the bejeweled sword that Arthur had called Excalibur?, as mentioned numerous times in numerous writings?
Even though the Sutton Hoo burial site might have nothing what so ever to do with King Arthur, the question remains that those helmets belonged to a British King who lived in the area or had requested to be buried at that particular spot. The big question is Who?
I bet that guide felt pretty awkward after I had said my piece.
However, those in the group listened to my outburst, it must have had an impact and stopped some of the bullshit the guides at the museum were notorious at spreading.
Shortly after that little episode at the British Museum, I wrote an article called treasure for the people, which was published and may have ruffled a few feathers.
Today, they still have the same exhibit, only this time they question who the King who was buried in the ship really was?
Strange that isn’t it. They still think its Anglo Saxon though despite the fact that Caesar wrote that British built their ships using iron nails, they still think its Anglo Saxon and refuse to accept the British had a large navy at that
particular period in time.
The Anglo Saxon’s used wood to construct their ships and wooden dowels to join the wood together. It makes one wonder where all of a sudden the Anglo Saxons managed to start making ships using iron nails, or obtaining the iron with which to make the nails?
Iron nails were used in the construction of the ship they found at Sutton Hoo. Since then I have visited one of the iron mines where the iron might, just might, have been mined and smelted to make those nails. But that’s another story.
Having discussed this matter with the noted historians Alan Wilson
and Baram Blackett we all agree on this matter as other British nobles and Kings were buried in a similar fashion. The burial sites of these nobles are known but owing to night hawks and unscrupulous individuals using metal detectors solely for their own greed and gain, with no interest of sharing the nations history and possible treasures with the people to whom the treasure really belongs we remain
silent in order to protect these sites.
The time has come to forget about past political correctness about what should be and what shouldn’t.. History belongs to the people. Today, we have a British army, a British passport, British birth certificate and we once had a British Empire.
The only people who call themselves English are those that follow 22 idiots chasing a dammed football around a field,because of a team that calls itself English instead of British.
Look on any Roman coin, on the tail it states Britannia meaning Britain. This is Britain and those that were born here are British, like it or not, and you should be proud of that fact and that the famous Battle of Britain was fought against the nazi’s in the second world war. That has never been described as a battle for England. Its time to stop the bullshit.
If the truth were really known, almost everyone now has British blood running through their veins owing to intermarriage over the years between the Anglo Saxons and the British (Welsh).
There are a few exceptions to the rule because I forgot to mention the Scots and the Irish who have also interbred thanks to the women of Britain, England, Ireland and Scotland who we can thank for bearing mans children and raising them. The men, well when an opportunity arises, don’t tell me your going to walk away from the worlds oldest sin,because it was installed in your genes ions ago.
Even the George Cross they use as an emblem is stolen from the
British. At a famous landmark in Wales that attracts visitors from all over the world are the ruins of a very old church and monastery. Although not a great deal remains,there are a few very old tiles depicting knights on horseback.
They all carry a shield bearing a very special insignia, which happens to be the St.George Cross. Owing to souvenir hunters and thieves I am not prepared to disclosed where the tiles can be found.
Not that I want them for myself, they are part of British history and belong to the public for all to see and should remain untouched for future generations to see and admire. They would be far better off in the custody of a museum.
Even today, London, still has connections with King Arthur. Take a short walk up the Strand, just outside the Law Courts in the middle of the road is an eternal symbol that was used by Uthyr Pendragon himself and that is the Dragon, which was also the symbol of Britain. Situated on almost every bridge you will see London’s coat of arms and dragons.
Almost every street within the city proudly bears the same emblem together with many of the bollards. In fact its almost impossible to go anywhere in London where you are unable to catch a glimpse of it.
The Brutus Stone or London Stone.
Only a fragment of the original stone survives, the stone is said to
have been brought there by Brutas all the way from Troy; he was supposed to have set it up in his New Troy (i.e.London) as an alter to Diana.. The London Stone has
always had a special significance, marking the sacred center of London. It can be found behind railings in a wall in the Bank of China, almost opposite Cannon Street Station. I recently visited the spot and had a bit of difficulty finding it.
Some people think the Stone can be traced back to Druid times,perhaps as a Pagan Ritual Altar or a sacrificial stone.
This was certainly the belief of the poet William Blake who, in 'To the Jews', imagined the groaning of the executed victims.
There's even a legend that claims it to be the same stone from which King Arthur pulled the sword, (although there are several places in Britain to make the same claim). Certainly it seems that this area of London has long been significant.
In 1840, excavations to build sewers at Bush Lane, next to Cannon Street Station uncovered ancient remains of large walls belonging to a pre-Roman building,perhaps some kind of palace.
Now this is interesting because it is recorded that both Bruta’s and King Llud built Palaces in London, could this be one of those building so hurriedly covered up and hushed up, so the public could not learn the truth about their history?
The early inhabitants of Britain, who arrived more than a thousand years before the Roman invasion, were the scattered remnants of the fallen city of Troy. They founded a city on the Thames and called it "Troia Newydd" (New Troy) which later became "Troynovant" or "Trinovantum".Brutus, King of the Britons
The story begins with the city of Troy in Asia Minor (now eastern Turkey), near the Bosphorus. The Trojans were at war against the Greeks, and they thought they had won. They found a large wooden horse outside the city that the Greeks had left behind, and they brought it into the city as a
trophy, not knowing that it was full of Greek soldiers.
During the night, when the Trojans were all asleep, the Greeks came out of the horse and opened the city gates, so that the Greek armies entered and destroyed the city. This happened during the reign of Priam, the last king of Troy,about 1182 BC.
The Trojans and Dardanians were allies, and there were intermarriages between their royal families. Aeneas was the son of Anchises, the leader of the Dardanian army. He married Creusa, the daughter of Priam, King of Troy, and they had a son called Ascanius. Aeneas and Creusa were third cousins, and their common ancestor was Tros, who founded the city of Troy. When the city was destroyed, Aeneas escaped with his father Anchises and his young son Ascanius,together with many other refugees, but Creusa got lost in the confusion. They first went to Africa, and then to Italy where they were well received by Latinus, king of the Latin’s.
Aeneas married Lavinia, the daughter of Latinus and they had a son called Silvius.
The journey of Aeneas to Italy, and his assimilation among the Latin’s, was later to become the subject of Virgil's "Aneid", written between 30 and 19 BC, so that he became immortalized in Roman literature.
Ascanius married and had a son,also called Silvius, who had his way with Lavinia's niece and got her pregnant. She gave birth to a son called Brutus, but she died during childbirth.When Brutus was 15 years old, he was out hunting with his father, and accidentally killed him while shooting an arrow at a deer. Thus he was considered to have killed both his father and his mother,although unintentionally, and was banished from Italy.
Brutus went to Greece where his royal lineage was recognized by Pandrasus, king of the Greeks, and by the downtrodden Trojans who had escaped from Troy and were living as an under-class among the Greeks. The Trojans adopted him as their leader and assembled themselves into an army.He went to Pandrasus and asked for their liberty,so that they could live as equals with the Greeks, or else be given
assistance to go to other lands. Pendrasus was enraged by this request and went to war against the Trojans, but Brutus prevailed against him. Pendrasus was anxious
to achieve a peace of some sort, but he recognized that the war had led to feelings of resentment that would make it impossible for the Trojans to continue living among the Greeks. He therefore decided that the departure of the Trojans
was the only possible option, and he furnished them with ships so that they could leave. He also gave his daughter Ignoge to Brutus, to be his wife.
Brutus and his army sailed away and stopped in a few parts of Africa, and then they sailed through the Pillars of Hercules (Straits of Gibraltar) and arrived in Gaul where they picked up some Trojan exiles. They fought some battles against the Gauls, then returned to their ships and sailed to their intended destination, an almost empty island to the north of Gaul known as "Alban" (Albion), which means "White Island".
Those who came with Brutus were called "Britons", and the island became known as "Britain". The date of their arrival is calculated to be 1074 BC, according to
a by Peter Roberts in his translation of Tysilio's "Chronicle of the Kings of Britain"
Brutus was a Trojan on his father's side and Latin on his mother's side. He was married to a Greek, so his descendants were Trojan, Latin and Greek. He was the first of a long line of kings, some of who intermarried with other European
royal families.
Bruta’s originally landed on the coast of Devon. Totnes on the dart is twelve miles from Torbay, which is the oldest seaport in South Devon. Here we find the closest evidence to Bruta’s possible and a custom handed down from time immemorial and was last observed on May the sixth 1910, when the mayor read a proclamation of King George.
There is a stone embedded in the road with a sign above it saying,“This is the Brutas stone.” The tradition being that this marks the spot where a Trojan Prince set foot after he landed in Britain after the fall of Troy in 1185 B.C.
There is also another Bruta’s stone situated in Cannon Street In the
City of London that Bruta’s is also said to have found and built up as a fine city. That stone is still to be seen in Cannon Street not far from the underground station.
It is said, “That should the stone disappear London will fall.”
Today it is preserved behind iron bars and protected by glass to stop individuals touching it and souvenir parts of it.
It is also highly unlikely that even after the Claudius invasion of AD 43 that the
Romans could have built such a city in the given time between the Boadacea rebellions of AD60. The Romans were in fact building up other places such as Colchester(Camulodunum)and Verulamium(St.Alban’s).
Archaeologists and historians today forget about King Llud and what
he did to fortify London despite strong documentary evidence elsewhere that clearly states that King Llud built the wall. Even today, Time team and its band
of back yard historians and archaeologists, when ever they come across anything they cant explain automatically jump on the old Roman, Anglo Saxon horseshit for answers and explanations.
King Llud had two sons, one called Afarwy,(Androgeus) who was the Duke of Kent, Teneufan (Tenuantius) Duke of Kent.
It appears that Caswallon, Llud’s brother had a mistress called Fflur (Flora) This lady was abducted and taken to Gaul. It appears that the jealous Afarwy was responsible and sought refuge with the Romans in Gaul. There is another story that Cassivellaunus was voted by all the tribe leaders to be King to lead the Britons in the fight against Caesar.(Julius)
Arfarwy considered that was his right and in a fit of rage sought vengeance against his uncle by joining Caesar in Gaul.
Arfarwy having struck a deal with Caesar that once Caesar had conquered Britain, Afarwy would be installed as the new king. Tysylio states that Arfarwy’s secret pact with Caesar is that he would open the gates of London to the Romans in return for being made King himself.
Thus Caesar had a second attempt to subdue Britain only to be subdued himself in the process.Arfarwy was taken back to Gaul together with others. Caesar never
returned to make a third attempt at making Britain as part of the Roman Empire. Caesar glossed over his writings to pacify the senate but disgruntled legionnaires upon their return to Rome started to reveal the truth,which eventually became public knowledge.
Eventually on the Ides of March Caesar was murdered.
The hierarchy in Rome must have known what had really taken place for there is no attempt to send troops or statesmen to Briton for another 96 years.
I wonder if you went into any modern school in London and asked a classroom of say thirteen or fourteen year olds,“Who founded London? No one in that classroom would be able to give the correct answer. To me that is a disgraceful state of affairs. Every Londoner or everyone who calls themselves such should know the answer because
it is part of their history and heritage,
Brentford situated further up the River Thames from Westminster also lays claim to fighting between Cassivellaunus and Caesar in 54 BC and have erected a monument to him to remember the event.
The monument is situated outside the county court where an archaeological dig took place before the new building was erected. Numerous finds were found.
Brentford is one of the few places where it would have been easy for Caesar's army to cross owing to the many islands in the River. At low tide it is possible for them to have crossed here.
Further evidence of there being a fortified ford in place here was discovered in 1909 when rows of palisades of oak were discovered and excavated. A plaque on the same monument tells the story along with other events of notable historical interest.
It is strange that Brentford with it's importance of the Caesarian
connections that a local museum does not exist.
However the publican opposite the old iron bridge remembers stories
of how the Romans crossed near the bridge.
The one thing that puzzles me is that the Romans were advancing onto
St.Alban's (Verulamium), maybe there is a confusion of dates here. Maybe this was the Claudian advance of the Romans, because it was written by others that Caesar showed his back to the Briton's at Trinovantum.
As Caesar and his forces left the Briton, Casswallon finally realized that Arfarwy had kidnapped his beloved fleur.Wasting no time Casswallon gathered up his forces and set after set after the scoundrel. So, we have all the elements of a modern day Hollywood spectacular just like Ben Hur except the events that to place here were real and well documented.
Caswallon or as the Romans called him Cassivellaunus is a real hero apart from his royal heritage. His place in history is assured as the person who defied Caesar and defeated him. When Caesar left the shores of Britain Rome had no further interest in the place for nearly 100 years.
Caswallon had held back the advances of the Roman Empire, Caesar returned home the all conquering hero only for the defeat to slowly leak out from the legionnaires and those that were there to witness the event.
Caesar had far more to lose, his name, his reputation, his credibility. He was Rome's most important leader and to return suffering defeat would have meant his demise with the senate.
In order to cover up his defeat he had to gloss over events as they happened.
The one thing he could not explain away was the loss of so many members of his army.
The True story of Llud, Caswallon, Nennius and the British people who lived and fought Julius Caesar is a very powerful one. The proof that this event did take place is scattered all over the internet. Most of it researched with the very documents I have already mentioned.
Casswallon eventually passes on and is succeeded by the rightful heir to the throne Teneufan followed by his son Cynvelyn (Cunobelius).
It is said that Cynvelyn visited Rome and met the Emperor Augustus.This claim was born out by an archeological dig on the Lexdon tumulus in 1922-24. Here a medallion of the Roman Emperor Augustus was found in what is suspected as the tomb of Cynvelyn. It is thought that the Emperor gave it himself to Cynvelyn.
What these King's actually did for Britain was to hold back the advance of the Roman Empire by almost 100 years
which in itself was a remarkable achievement. The time for these forgotten hero's has come for their complete recognition, they deserve it. It is our History and our heritage of which all Briton's today should be proud, including that bunch of Cambridge skeptics that class themselves as being educated.
Sorry I don't fit into their category I was educated in a grammar school, my teachers were moron's. If I had not delved into the past to find out the truth for myself I would be classed as another moron. It should not be like that. We all
deserve the best education from the best teachers the government can provide.
Education today is vital and must be factual. Living a lie is dangerous for the very structure of society is based on the truth, the whole truth and nothing but. The day of reckoning is fast approaching. What will the academics claim when
new discoveries are made? Fraud is the first, manufactured is the second, fiction the third.
So, where does all my research fit into all of this, is it fiction.No flaming way, Are my writings a fraud? I am only repeating what evidence is available so where's the fraud and where is the profit?
There is no profit in the truth for gods sake, the only motive is to inform and enlighten the general public of the truth.
They of all people as British Citizens they are entitled to know
their history and heritage as well.
It is only a matter of time now before the Cambridge
Academics finally will concede to the truth as written and laid down in the Mabinogian, the triads, Geoffrey of Monmouth,Nennius and Gilda's and others who have seen the light and know the truth.
Their credibility is in doubt, they are in danger of losing the plot, too much has been revealed, the truth is known they are hiding now behind false hopes and there is no way they can extract themselves except from finally accepting the truth.
There is an empty plinth in Trafalgar Square just waiting for the right person or persons to be placed upon it.That plinth really belongs to those that fought for Britain's freedom and independence so long ago. The time has come for the
Man with Breasts(Knockers)..Click to Enlarge. See footnote 4 below
academics to rethink their logic. Others like myself are doing their own research digging up cans of worms just like this. Today, we want the truth, we expect the truth and nothing less.
The time has come to put your thinking caps on.
It's time for, "TIME TEAM," to clean up it's act, next time they come across the ruins of an old church, think first before jumping to conclusions and bellowing out Roman or Anglo-Saxon. Next time you find foundations of part of the London Wall or Palaces that were not exactly roman, do not cover it up in haste explore and pass on the knowledge you gain to the public.
Today we live in a world of Knowledge, the demand for the truth is all around us. There were many British Kings that followed Llud, Caswallon, Nennius and many other's including King Arthur. They all deserve their rightful in history.
Royalty did not start with the Anglo Saxon's. It was alive and thriving in Britain long before they or William the conqueror took over in 1066. Historian's who fail to delve beyond this time barrier through to the dark age and beyond are only failing themselves and the general public who have a thirst for knowledge and now demand answers.
Fortunately in this world of high technology, the information gap is narrowing, people now have access to material they never dreamed of years ago. Even libraries these days owing to budget cuts fail to provide the information that should be freely available to everyone not the select few.
I have attempted to uncover the past and put it back into it's true perspective. I researched this following almost every possible lead I could lay my hands on. Photographs have been provided to substantiate my writings. Only you the reader, can decided with all the available evidence I have provided to decide is this fact or fiction?
All material here is Copyright. LONG WINDED MAYBE BUT EDUCATIONAL...Alan Hassell
Move pointer(LH button down) slowly OVER images for maximum effectiveness...Agendums may be codified for black-op pre-emptiveness..:-)..These pages carry "hidden messages"..When the pointer moves over an image it shows the hidden message which Mozilla does not do(blame W3C)...so there is an "add-on" for Firefox,Netscape 7 and Mozilla alternate image..Please go Here to download the open source add-on..It only takes a second and its well worth it....Troedyrhiw
Ancient Kings of Britain PART 2 ..by Alan Hassell
©opyright all rights reserved 1/2/2004
September 12, 2009, 06:10:12 PM
Images, footnotes and layout and image comments with commentary at page bottom by Troedyrhiw
When will the director’s, historians and so-called archaeologists wake up and put two and two together? What are they paid for anyway?
Isn’t it their job and responsibility to inform the public of the truth and how it all came to be?
Isn’t there anyone who gets a nice fat salary from the government game enough to stand up and admit the truth? Why do they leave the public to work this out for themselves?.I doubt it in this day and age; some would lie out of their eyeteeth rather than lose a lucrative job with a promise of a pension on retirement.
I always knew that King Llud had started London. When I worked at Fleet Street as a youth, there used to be a statue of King Llud and his sons situated at Ludgate Circus as a memorial to King Llud who was one of the principle founders of Londinium.....
King Lud and his two sons...Click for Larger Image...See Footnote 3 
King Lud and his two sons...Click for Larger ImageIt appears Llud’s statue and his wall has had a turbulent career over the centuries. During King John’s reign when he was forced to sign the Magna Charta, riots broke out in London. The Jewish quarter in Ludgate was stormed and materials were taken to restore the damage done to the walls. Year’s later evidence of this was found when stones bearing Hebrew characters were discovered in the masonry of the gate... See footnote 1
In 1260, during the reign of Henry III the gate was again adorned with the statues of Llud and his two sons,Androgeus, (Arfarwy) and Tenuantius. During the reign of Edward VI, for some reason the population took a dislike to all images and decapitated the heads off of the statues. These were eventually restored by Queen Mary.
However during the reign of Queen Elizabeth the first, the gate was taken down and completely rebuilt with the statues being moved over to the eastern side of the gate. In 1990 the City of London and Ludgate underwent a major redevelopment of the area.
The bridge that carried the underground railway was removed and trains diverted underground. Llud’s statues were also moved to St.Dustan’s in the west,just up the road from Fleet Street near the law courts. It can be found in an alcove of the old church via the side entrance, which is often hard to see as the gates are often locked. I think Llud’s statue should be removed and installed in the care of the Museum of London where it might even be restored to its original condition.
Brutus was the originally founder of the capitol city of Lloegres on the north side of the River Thames and he called it Troia Newydd, meaning,“New Troy”, this is documented in the Brut Tysylio and on many websites on the Internet if you want to check it out yourself.
Geoffrey of Monmouth in his Latin translation became Troia Nova,which was later corrupted into Trinovantium.
Nennius also calls London Trinovantium and says that, “Caesar fought a battle against the British near a place called Trinovantium. Caesar also writes that this battle was fought by the only ford available on the Thames, at the Island of Thorns, which is now Westminister.
Trinovantium has to be no other place than London.
Much is known about King Llud or Llud AP Beli Mawr AP Manogan, he started, his reign in 72 BC, seventeen years before the Romans even came to Britain. He was the regional King of the North Thames area.He is reputed to have been a very powerful leader owning many cities and castles. He also had a reputation of being a mighty warrior in battle.
Llud had a very powerful brother called Cassivellaunus (Casswallon) which was corrupted into Casswallon who reigned from 58-38 BC.
Llud also knew of the importance of building defenses and as Troia Newydd (London) was one of his favorite places he did in fact fortify it.
Belinus, Llud’s father is said to have been building a large wall eight foot thick at its foundations out of stone and limestone.
During Llud’s childhood he would have spent many days with his father whilst he was building the great wall and would continue the work long after his fathers death. The wall was reputed to be over twenty feet high and enclosed a large area protecting the city from any invaders.
According to the Brut Tysylio and other traditional histories King Llud is credited with building a huge wall made out of lime and stone around the city which was eight foot thick at its base. Apparently this wall enclosed an area of 324 acres and was claimed to have been there before the Boadacea rebellion in AD 60.
He also built huge towers and in the west part of the wall built this huge gate. Once it was complete Llud ordered that the gate be named after him hence the name Ludgate which is still used today. This again is documented in the Mabinogion.This proves that the Mabinogian is telling the truth and not the myths,fairy tales and porky pies, as some completely uneducated individuals would like us all to believe.
There were many gates built on the wall, the place names remain to this day, Aldgate, Highgate, Ludgate, Newgate, Billingsgate, named after Llud’s father Beli Mawr, Bishops gate and Cripplegate to name a few.
It is possible that some of these were added onto the great wall after Lud's death.
In Guildhall there are very old engravings of what were the ten gates that allowed entrance to the great city.
The Guildhall
Priory Gate and Church TowerLincoln-Inn Gate and Chancery Lane Gate
LudGate and NewGate
Bishops Gate and Cripple Gate
Alders Gate and Bridge GateLlud’s father King Heli (Beli Mawr in the Welsh) ruled for forty years until 73 BC,during which time he continued to build great buildings in London and passed on his building skills to his son Llud who became king. It appears that although Llud is given much credit for building London, it was a continuing process of development started by Bruta’s and continued through the ages. Just as development and re-development has continued within the city of London to the present day.
Not much of the great wall that Llud built is left standing although there is much of it to be seen still around a few places in London.
Starting out at Tower Hill almost directly opposite the Tower itself and beside the underground tube station is one section still to be see about twenty five feet high and some 80 yards in length.
Brutus Wall near Trinity Place London..Click to Enlarge
London Tower Hill..Brutus Wall...Click to EnlargeJust around the corner from the station is the Grand hotel, which has two flaming torches outside the main building. In the car park next to the main entrance one can see another 100-foot section of the wall, which has been decorated with lights and is more colourful to photograph. What is interesting here is the fact that at the wall, which is fenced off, is split between the car park and basement below. One can see down into the basement and the size of the actual foundations of the wall.
They are as already stated and written down throughout time and history about eight foot thick. Although this is claimed to be a Roman Wall, it fits the descriptions already written many centuries ago and there is no doubt that this wall was built by Llud as was written. The Romans may of repaired and extended sections of the wall during their occupation, but they were not the initial architects and builders of the wall.
Even more astounding is the fact that this hotel is redeveloping a site next door having bought the site they now intend to expand with this added extension.Now the interesting thing is that they have an archaeologist on the site because the builders have come across the foundations of another section of the wall once more.
BRUTUS WALL ON NOBLE STREET LONDON.See rect/square Plaque in Centre of Image.Click to EnlargeAlthough, I wasn’t allowed to take photographs the hole the builders had already dug was a good thirty to forty feet below street level.When you add another twenty to thirty feet of the wall above street level, the height of the actual wall could have been forty to fifty feet high in its day.It would also have been a really massive sight to behold and would have presented many problems for anyone wanting to take London by storm.
There are more sections of the wall still visible for the general public to see especially around Barbican near the Museum of London and surrounding streets.
...RUINS OF THE BARBICAN ON LUDGATE HILL??...Click to Enlarge...See Footnote 2 below It is claimed that not far from Ludgate, Llud also built himself a fine palace, which is the Bishop of London’s palace.
What all this really means is that London was by its size the largest city not only in Britain but also in the whole of Europe.
If this is so then we have a motive for Caesars greed to take such a prize.
King Llud is also said to have been the first person to have measured Briton from top to bottom and coast to coast.
Llud had sons, so there must have been a woman in his life, sadly I have been unable to come up with the name of such a woman, it may well be that Llud had a number of ladies he shared his affections with.
Apart from building a palace for himself, Llud also invited others to build many fine houses within his walls that he had built. Hmmmm, now just a cotton-picking minute, who were the people that stated the Briton’s lived in wooden thatched huts? Here, we have a direct statement of fine palaces being built and lived in.
It is precisely at this point that the Academics will start ranting and raving that the wall was built by the Romans, but was it? Now start putting your thinking caps on kiddiewinks and start reading about the Trojan war and how the Trojans were able to hold out against the armies of Greece for Ten Years. Brutus and his men would have realized the importance of defenses and would have taken measures to ensure they were well protected, they certainly had many years prior to Caesar's visit to construct it.
Didn’t a huge wall protect Troy too? The Greek Army tried hard enough to get inside the huge wall and only gained entrance by using the famous Trojan horse.
Surely someone with Brutus would have known about the importance of walls keeping out the enemy? We are not talking about wild uneducated savages here, these were well-educated individuals who had seen and experienced beautiful palaces with marble columns and floors and knew how to protect themselves too.
Brutu's even married a Greek Princess, for god's sake she lived in style in palaces befitting her stature and rank. Her own father would not have lived in a mere shack so why would she?
Are these so called academics taught nothing or is that what they are told to preach? Sometimes it is better not to be educated and know something than to be
educated and know nothing.
They had a fluent knowledge of the Greek language, the Roman historians tell us, and so does Strabo. So why wouldn’t they also have a knowledge of building fine palaces? Even in Llud’s day London was a very busy city where merchants provided and sold merchandise from many countries including much Mediterranean produce.
In fact, there are several mentions that the Kings of Britain not only lived in fine palaces but used marble and had mosaic tiles floors with intricate designs placed on them too.
The British Museum has a fine example with the Christian religious symbol of Chi Rho featured plainly on it. Only a very brave man and powerful leader would have had such on the floor or walls of his house. Although, it is credited with being Roman, it is highly probable and not impossible that this came from one of the palaces that were once owned by a ruling King of Britain as it was there religion.
Even after the Claudian invasion, the Roman’s, although they might have tried to convert the British to Christianity gave up and never intervened in the British way of religion. The Roman’s had too many gods whilst the British only had one in which to put their faith in.
This explains why the Chi Rho mosaic now on prominent view to the public in the British Museum was allowed to be situated where it was and tolerated by the Roman’s, if they ever saw it?
The truth is the great wall of London had already been built when the Roman’s arrived and whilst they may of built onto and added to it and maybe repaired it in certain places they alone did not build it, the British did so it is high time this was recognized and renamed Llud's wall, who is named as the architect in so many documents.
PART OF LONDON,SHOWING THE ANCIENT WALL..Click to Enlarge....Note the number of Gates(10) surround the City of London..They are shown as double pillars..Check their names if possible Not everything that the British Museum states has to be correct.This is because they refuse to recognize anything that might be British or something they simply do not understand.Therefore they make these wild assumptions about it possibly being Roman or Saxon without even considering other possibilities.
I will give credit where it is due, I admire the honesty of the curator of the Museum of London who gave me detailed information regarding the statues of King Llud. I was hoping the Museum would place the statue in the museum in order for its future preservation and for the people. Some historians do have a genuine interest in the British Kings.
How many treasures in the museum connected to the Roman’s are or were originally British? Who would know for sure? As the Briton’s would have adopted Greek as well as Roman architecture before the Romans did gain a foothold.
The question remains, how many British building were mistaken as being Roman? No one in the Museum can give a definite answer to the question, and no one would dare answer it.
One cannot lay the blame on the staff and everyone working for museums. They are the guardians of the nations treasures. Unfortunately politics and politicians lay down the guidelines of what can and what cannot be stated. The same as what is acceptable to be taught in Britain's schools.
The Brut Tysylio and the Mabinogian state that Brutus who was a great great grandson of Aeneas originally founded London. Brutus died after a memorial reign of twenty-four years and was interred by the side of Imogene on the Bryn Gwyn (the White Mount). Which is believed to have been where the Tower of London now stands or in that area.
After the destruction of Troy around 1,200 B.C., Aeneas, born of a royal bloodline fled with the remnants of his people and settled in Italy. There he married the daughter of Latinus, the king of the Latin’s, and through this line later emerged the Roman Empire.
The grandson of Aeneas, a man called Brutus,had to flee Italy when he accidentally killed his father on a hunting trip.
He arrived in Greece, on discovery of his royal lineage,dispossessed Trojans flocked to his command. He eventually married the daughter of the Greek king. He then commandeered a fleet and was visited by the goddess Diana and was sent to sail west until he found a land where his people would live in peace.
Brutus eventually reached the isle of Albion, landing at Totnes in Cornwall. He eventually founded the city of Trinovantum (New Troy), or Caer Troia as the Britons called it,around 1000 B.C. the city was dedicated to the goddess Diana by Brutus and he founded a temple to her.
Diabolical as it might sound to some, this is well documented and references to Brutas and his discoveries can be found all over the internet so this is not a figment of my imagination it is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but.
There are web sites that anyone can even trace the origins of people right back to Adam and Eve if you have the inclination and time to look for them. Knowledge in this day and age is so important if we are to find our real roots and who we really are.
King Llud (73 BC) re-named it "Caer-Llud" (Llud’s Town). It later became known as London. When Llud died, he was buried near a gateway called Ludgate.
The re-naming of the city has been a disaster for British history.Not only have we forgotten our links with ancient Troy, but we have also given ground to the advocates of evolution,who don't want us to know that, through the Trojans, we can trace our ancestry all the way back to Noah. For the skeptics, Troy was found by Hienrich Schlieman a noted German archaeologist. There is no excuse for
historians or anyone to say Troy was a myth and did not exist.
Now, this is where a very strange modern day treasure find comes into the story. Towards the end of 2003 British television station channel four screened a new series of finds made in Britain by metal detectorists called, “Hidden Treasure”.
In one of the series of programs someone had found a large collection of coins. To make the program more interesting an archaeological dig took place.
It was during the dig that a huge quantity of bones were uncovered and on forensic testing they were found to be animal bones indicating that a huge feast had taken place at one time.
In those days a battle would be fought during the day and they would collect their dead and bury them during the night. It was more like something out of a loony tunes cartoon where Wiley Coyote would clock on in the morning for his shift while Ralph the devoted watch dog would stand guard over the flock of sheep during the day only to clock off at night fall.
After the fighting when the battle had been fought and won a great feast was held, this might not be in one spot alone but in many different towns and settlements.
The Welsh triads record that Caswallon ordered the slaughter of 120,000 animals for a great feast to celebrate the victory. With the discovery of the huge number of animal bones that were found by accident following an archaeological dig on a site where coins were found buried, it shows that the triads are true and more attention should be given to them for their accuracy.
Why, I asked again, did none of the archaeologists or historians at the British Museum connect this find to what happened in AD 55? Maybe, they stubbornly refuse to recognize these old documents which far from telling myths and fairy tales are telling the truth about what happened in the so call dark ages. It is high time that these so called academics paid more attention to these writings and old documents.
Many years ago I wrote an article about my travels to the British Museum in which I mentioned the Sutton Hoo burial ship and how the guides considered it to be Anglo Saxon. They even gave the name of the supposed King that had been buried in it as Raedwald.
Sticking my nose in where it wasn’t wanted I suggested to the guide that the helmets could have belonged to King Arthur? The Romans described the Britons as being clean-shaven and having moustaches the same as depicted on the helmets?
This helmet ABOVE-Artists RepresentatonThose two famous helmets, one for use in battle and one for ceremonial purposes can only describe the person wearing them as being clean shaven and having a moustache, exactly as described by Roman writers.
Could there have been a misdating of the burial? Look at the items found in the ship? Is that not the bejeweled sword that Arthur had called Excalibur?, as mentioned numerous times in numerous writings?
Even though the Sutton Hoo burial site might have nothing what so ever to do with King Arthur, the question remains that those helmets belonged to a British King who lived in the area or had requested to be buried at that particular spot. The big question is Who?
I bet that guide felt pretty awkward after I had said my piece.
However, those in the group listened to my outburst, it must have had an impact and stopped some of the bullshit the guides at the museum were notorious at spreading.
Shortly after that little episode at the British Museum, I wrote an article called treasure for the people, which was published and may have ruffled a few feathers.
Today, they still have the same exhibit, only this time they question who the King who was buried in the ship really was?
Strange that isn’t it. They still think its Anglo Saxon though despite the fact that Caesar wrote that British built their ships using iron nails, they still think its Anglo Saxon and refuse to accept the British had a large navy at that
particular period in time.
The Anglo Saxon’s used wood to construct their ships and wooden dowels to join the wood together. It makes one wonder where all of a sudden the Anglo Saxons managed to start making ships using iron nails, or obtaining the iron with which to make the nails?
Iron nails were used in the construction of the ship they found at Sutton Hoo. Since then I have visited one of the iron mines where the iron might, just might, have been mined and smelted to make those nails. But that’s another story.
Having discussed this matter with the noted historians Alan Wilson
and Baram Blackett we all agree on this matter as other British nobles and Kings were buried in a similar fashion. The burial sites of these nobles are known but owing to night hawks and unscrupulous individuals using metal detectors solely for their own greed and gain, with no interest of sharing the nations history and possible treasures with the people to whom the treasure really belongs we remain
silent in order to protect these sites.
The time has come to forget about past political correctness about what should be and what shouldn’t.. History belongs to the people. Today, we have a British army, a British passport, British birth certificate and we once had a British Empire.
The only people who call themselves English are those that follow 22 idiots chasing a dammed football around a field,because of a team that calls itself English instead of British.
Look on any Roman coin, on the tail it states Britannia meaning Britain. This is Britain and those that were born here are British, like it or not, and you should be proud of that fact and that the famous Battle of Britain was fought against the nazi’s in the second world war. That has never been described as a battle for England. Its time to stop the bullshit.
If the truth were really known, almost everyone now has British blood running through their veins owing to intermarriage over the years between the Anglo Saxons and the British (Welsh).
There are a few exceptions to the rule because I forgot to mention the Scots and the Irish who have also interbred thanks to the women of Britain, England, Ireland and Scotland who we can thank for bearing mans children and raising them. The men, well when an opportunity arises, don’t tell me your going to walk away from the worlds oldest sin,because it was installed in your genes ions ago.
Even the George Cross they use as an emblem is stolen from the
British. At a famous landmark in Wales that attracts visitors from all over the world are the ruins of a very old church and monastery. Although not a great deal remains,there are a few very old tiles depicting knights on horseback.
They all carry a shield bearing a very special insignia, which happens to be the St.George Cross. Owing to souvenir hunters and thieves I am not prepared to disclosed where the tiles can be found.
Not that I want them for myself, they are part of British history and belong to the public for all to see and should remain untouched for future generations to see and admire. They would be far better off in the custody of a museum.
Even today, London, still has connections with King Arthur. Take a short walk up the Strand, just outside the Law Courts in the middle of the road is an eternal symbol that was used by Uthyr Pendragon himself and that is the Dragon, which was also the symbol of Britain. Situated on almost every bridge you will see London’s coat of arms and dragons.
Almost every street within the city proudly bears the same emblem together with many of the bollards. In fact its almost impossible to go anywhere in London where you are unable to catch a glimpse of it.
The Brutus Stone or London Stone.
Only a fragment of the original stone survives, the stone is said to
have been brought there by Brutas all the way from Troy; he was supposed to have set it up in his New Troy (i.e.London) as an alter to Diana.. The London Stone has
always had a special significance, marking the sacred center of London. It can be found behind railings in a wall in the Bank of China, almost opposite Cannon Street Station. I recently visited the spot and had a bit of difficulty finding it.
Some people think the Stone can be traced back to Druid times,perhaps as a Pagan Ritual Altar or a sacrificial stone.
This was certainly the belief of the poet William Blake who, in 'To the Jews', imagined the groaning of the executed victims.
There's even a legend that claims it to be the same stone from which King Arthur pulled the sword, (although there are several places in Britain to make the same claim). Certainly it seems that this area of London has long been significant.
In 1840, excavations to build sewers at Bush Lane, next to Cannon Street Station uncovered ancient remains of large walls belonging to a pre-Roman building,perhaps some kind of palace.
Now this is interesting because it is recorded that both Bruta’s and King Llud built Palaces in London, could this be one of those building so hurriedly covered up and hushed up, so the public could not learn the truth about their history?
The early inhabitants of Britain, who arrived more than a thousand years before the Roman invasion, were the scattered remnants of the fallen city of Troy. They founded a city on the Thames and called it "Troia Newydd" (New Troy) which later became "Troynovant" or "Trinovantum".Brutus, King of the Britons
The story begins with the city of Troy in Asia Minor (now eastern Turkey), near the Bosphorus. The Trojans were at war against the Greeks, and they thought they had won. They found a large wooden horse outside the city that the Greeks had left behind, and they brought it into the city as a
trophy, not knowing that it was full of Greek soldiers.
During the night, when the Trojans were all asleep, the Greeks came out of the horse and opened the city gates, so that the Greek armies entered and destroyed the city. This happened during the reign of Priam, the last king of Troy,about 1182 BC.
The Trojans and Dardanians were allies, and there were intermarriages between their royal families. Aeneas was the son of Anchises, the leader of the Dardanian army. He married Creusa, the daughter of Priam, King of Troy, and they had a son called Ascanius. Aeneas and Creusa were third cousins, and their common ancestor was Tros, who founded the city of Troy. When the city was destroyed, Aeneas escaped with his father Anchises and his young son Ascanius,together with many other refugees, but Creusa got lost in the confusion. They first went to Africa, and then to Italy where they were well received by Latinus, king of the Latin’s.
Aeneas married Lavinia, the daughter of Latinus and they had a son called Silvius.
The journey of Aeneas to Italy, and his assimilation among the Latin’s, was later to become the subject of Virgil's "Aneid", written between 30 and 19 BC, so that he became immortalized in Roman literature.
Ascanius married and had a son,also called Silvius, who had his way with Lavinia's niece and got her pregnant. She gave birth to a son called Brutus, but she died during childbirth.When Brutus was 15 years old, he was out hunting with his father, and accidentally killed him while shooting an arrow at a deer. Thus he was considered to have killed both his father and his mother,although unintentionally, and was banished from Italy.
Brutus went to Greece where his royal lineage was recognized by Pandrasus, king of the Greeks, and by the downtrodden Trojans who had escaped from Troy and were living as an under-class among the Greeks. The Trojans adopted him as their leader and assembled themselves into an army.He went to Pandrasus and asked for their liberty,so that they could live as equals with the Greeks, or else be given
assistance to go to other lands. Pendrasus was enraged by this request and went to war against the Trojans, but Brutus prevailed against him. Pendrasus was anxious
to achieve a peace of some sort, but he recognized that the war had led to feelings of resentment that would make it impossible for the Trojans to continue living among the Greeks. He therefore decided that the departure of the Trojans
was the only possible option, and he furnished them with ships so that they could leave. He also gave his daughter Ignoge to Brutus, to be his wife.
Brutus and his army sailed away and stopped in a few parts of Africa, and then they sailed through the Pillars of Hercules (Straits of Gibraltar) and arrived in Gaul where they picked up some Trojan exiles. They fought some battles against the Gauls, then returned to their ships and sailed to their intended destination, an almost empty island to the north of Gaul known as "Alban" (Albion), which means "White Island".
Those who came with Brutus were called "Britons", and the island became known as "Britain". The date of their arrival is calculated to be 1074 BC, according to
a by Peter Roberts in his translation of Tysilio's "Chronicle of the Kings of Britain"
Brutus was a Trojan on his father's side and Latin on his mother's side. He was married to a Greek, so his descendants were Trojan, Latin and Greek. He was the first of a long line of kings, some of who intermarried with other European
royal families.
Bruta’s originally landed on the coast of Devon. Totnes on the dart is twelve miles from Torbay, which is the oldest seaport in South Devon. Here we find the closest evidence to Bruta’s possible and a custom handed down from time immemorial and was last observed on May the sixth 1910, when the mayor read a proclamation of King George.
There is a stone embedded in the road with a sign above it saying,“This is the Brutas stone.” The tradition being that this marks the spot where a Trojan Prince set foot after he landed in Britain after the fall of Troy in 1185 B.C.
There is also another Bruta’s stone situated in Cannon Street In the
City of London that Bruta’s is also said to have found and built up as a fine city. That stone is still to be seen in Cannon Street not far from the underground station.
It is said, “That should the stone disappear London will fall.”
Today it is preserved behind iron bars and protected by glass to stop individuals touching it and souvenir parts of it.
It is also highly unlikely that even after the Claudius invasion of AD 43 that the
Romans could have built such a city in the given time between the Boadacea rebellions of AD60. The Romans were in fact building up other places such as Colchester(Camulodunum)and Verulamium(St.Alban’s).
Archaeologists and historians today forget about King Llud and what
he did to fortify London despite strong documentary evidence elsewhere that clearly states that King Llud built the wall. Even today, Time team and its band
of back yard historians and archaeologists, when ever they come across anything they cant explain automatically jump on the old Roman, Anglo Saxon horseshit for answers and explanations.
King Llud had two sons, one called Afarwy,(Androgeus) who was the Duke of Kent, Teneufan (Tenuantius) Duke of Kent.
It appears that Caswallon, Llud’s brother had a mistress called Fflur (Flora) This lady was abducted and taken to Gaul. It appears that the jealous Afarwy was responsible and sought refuge with the Romans in Gaul. There is another story that Cassivellaunus was voted by all the tribe leaders to be King to lead the Britons in the fight against Caesar.(Julius)
Arfarwy considered that was his right and in a fit of rage sought vengeance against his uncle by joining Caesar in Gaul.
Arfarwy having struck a deal with Caesar that once Caesar had conquered Britain, Afarwy would be installed as the new king. Tysylio states that Arfarwy’s secret pact with Caesar is that he would open the gates of London to the Romans in return for being made King himself.
Thus Caesar had a second attempt to subdue Britain only to be subdued himself in the process.Arfarwy was taken back to Gaul together with others. Caesar never
returned to make a third attempt at making Britain as part of the Roman Empire. Caesar glossed over his writings to pacify the senate but disgruntled legionnaires upon their return to Rome started to reveal the truth,which eventually became public knowledge.
Eventually on the Ides of March Caesar was murdered.
The hierarchy in Rome must have known what had really taken place for there is no attempt to send troops or statesmen to Briton for another 96 years.
I wonder if you went into any modern school in London and asked a classroom of say thirteen or fourteen year olds,“Who founded London? No one in that classroom would be able to give the correct answer. To me that is a disgraceful state of affairs. Every Londoner or everyone who calls themselves such should know the answer because
it is part of their history and heritage,
Brentford situated further up the River Thames from Westminster also lays claim to fighting between Cassivellaunus and Caesar in 54 BC and have erected a monument to him to remember the event.
The monument is situated outside the county court where an archaeological dig took place before the new building was erected. Numerous finds were found.
Brentford is one of the few places where it would have been easy for Caesar's army to cross owing to the many islands in the River. At low tide it is possible for them to have crossed here.
Further evidence of there being a fortified ford in place here was discovered in 1909 when rows of palisades of oak were discovered and excavated. A plaque on the same monument tells the story along with other events of notable historical interest.
It is strange that Brentford with it's importance of the Caesarian
connections that a local museum does not exist.
However the publican opposite the old iron bridge remembers stories
of how the Romans crossed near the bridge.
The one thing that puzzles me is that the Romans were advancing onto
St.Alban's (Verulamium), maybe there is a confusion of dates here. Maybe this was the Claudian advance of the Romans, because it was written by others that Caesar showed his back to the Briton's at Trinovantum.
As Caesar and his forces left the Briton, Casswallon finally realized that Arfarwy had kidnapped his beloved fleur.Wasting no time Casswallon gathered up his forces and set after set after the scoundrel. So, we have all the elements of a modern day Hollywood spectacular just like Ben Hur except the events that to place here were real and well documented.
Caswallon or as the Romans called him Cassivellaunus is a real hero apart from his royal heritage. His place in history is assured as the person who defied Caesar and defeated him. When Caesar left the shores of Britain Rome had no further interest in the place for nearly 100 years.
Caswallon had held back the advances of the Roman Empire, Caesar returned home the all conquering hero only for the defeat to slowly leak out from the legionnaires and those that were there to witness the event.
Caesar had far more to lose, his name, his reputation, his credibility. He was Rome's most important leader and to return suffering defeat would have meant his demise with the senate.
In order to cover up his defeat he had to gloss over events as they happened.
The one thing he could not explain away was the loss of so many members of his army.
The True story of Llud, Caswallon, Nennius and the British people who lived and fought Julius Caesar is a very powerful one. The proof that this event did take place is scattered all over the internet. Most of it researched with the very documents I have already mentioned.
Casswallon eventually passes on and is succeeded by the rightful heir to the throne Teneufan followed by his son Cynvelyn (Cunobelius).
It is said that Cynvelyn visited Rome and met the Emperor Augustus.This claim was born out by an archeological dig on the Lexdon tumulus in 1922-24. Here a medallion of the Roman Emperor Augustus was found in what is suspected as the tomb of Cynvelyn. It is thought that the Emperor gave it himself to Cynvelyn.
What these King's actually did for Britain was to hold back the advance of the Roman Empire by almost 100 years
which in itself was a remarkable achievement. The time for these forgotten hero's has come for their complete recognition, they deserve it. It is our History and our heritage of which all Briton's today should be proud, including that bunch of Cambridge skeptics that class themselves as being educated.
Sorry I don't fit into their category I was educated in a grammar school, my teachers were moron's. If I had not delved into the past to find out the truth for myself I would be classed as another moron. It should not be like that. We all
deserve the best education from the best teachers the government can provide.
Education today is vital and must be factual. Living a lie is dangerous for the very structure of society is based on the truth, the whole truth and nothing but. The day of reckoning is fast approaching. What will the academics claim when
new discoveries are made? Fraud is the first, manufactured is the second, fiction the third.
So, where does all my research fit into all of this, is it fiction.No flaming way, Are my writings a fraud? I am only repeating what evidence is available so where's the fraud and where is the profit?
There is no profit in the truth for gods sake, the only motive is to inform and enlighten the general public of the truth.
They of all people as British Citizens they are entitled to know
their history and heritage as well.
It is only a matter of time now before the Cambridge
Academics finally will concede to the truth as written and laid down in the Mabinogian, the triads, Geoffrey of Monmouth,Nennius and Gilda's and others who have seen the light and know the truth.
Their credibility is in doubt, they are in danger of losing the plot, too much has been revealed, the truth is known they are hiding now behind false hopes and there is no way they can extract themselves except from finally accepting the truth.
There is an empty plinth in Trafalgar Square just waiting for the right person or persons to be placed upon it.That plinth really belongs to those that fought for Britain's freedom and independence so long ago. The time has come for the
Man with Breasts(Knockers)..Click to Enlarge. See footnote 4 belowacademics to rethink their logic. Others like myself are doing their own research digging up cans of worms just like this. Today, we want the truth, we expect the truth and nothing less.
The time has come to put your thinking caps on.
It's time for, "TIME TEAM," to clean up it's act, next time they come across the ruins of an old church, think first before jumping to conclusions and bellowing out Roman or Anglo-Saxon. Next time you find foundations of part of the London Wall or Palaces that were not exactly roman, do not cover it up in haste explore and pass on the knowledge you gain to the public.
Today we live in a world of Knowledge, the demand for the truth is all around us. There were many British Kings that followed Llud, Caswallon, Nennius and many other's including King Arthur. They all deserve their rightful in history.
Royalty did not start with the Anglo Saxon's. It was alive and thriving in Britain long before they or William the conqueror took over in 1066. Historian's who fail to delve beyond this time barrier through to the dark age and beyond are only failing themselves and the general public who have a thirst for knowledge and now demand answers.
Fortunately in this world of high technology, the information gap is narrowing, people now have access to material they never dreamed of years ago. Even libraries these days owing to budget cuts fail to provide the information that should be freely available to everyone not the select few.
I have attempted to uncover the past and put it back into it's true perspective. I researched this following almost every possible lead I could lay my hands on. Photographs have been provided to substantiate my writings. Only you the reader, can decided with all the available evidence I have provided to decide is this fact or fiction?
All material here is Copyright. LONG WINDED MAYBE BUT EDUCATIONAL...Alan Hassell
Sutton Hoo never was Anglo or Saxon by Alan Wilson
Another colleague of Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett is Mr Alan Hassell who lives in London. This tireless researcher is the metal detection expert who has assisted Alan and Baram for may years. The ability to detect larger metal objects up to thirty feet below ground and to differentiate between ferrous and non-ferrous metal when detected was of great value to the research programme.
Alan Hassell took a keen interest in ancient British London, the ‘Troy novantium’ as King Edward I knew of it. He knew of the Brutus Stone that is the ancient foundation stone of London. Adrian Gilbert traced this in 1996 to the resting of the last remnant of the stone that is in an alcove cut into that wall of a London bank. This Brutus Stone was there from time immemorial until the London Authorities cut away two thirds of it to make way for a road-widening scheme. Jack Cade who is almost certainly Sion O’Ceint –John of Kent in Khumric records, and the leader of the peasants revolt in AD
One of Alan Hassell’s projects was to take a close look at the Sutton Hoo treasures in the British Museum. In common with the persistent policy of achaeologists having only two labels -one Roman and the other Anglo-Saxon- the Museum has come up with the totally unsubstantiated story that the boat burial at Sutton Hoo was probably that of an Angle King named as Redwald. The reasoning
Excavation of Ship in !939behind this assertion is flimsy to say the least.The largest grave mound at Sutton Hoo was excavated in 1939 in the summer just before World War II broke out. The archaeologists did a very good job indeed and they were able to completely expose the entire shape of a large boat that had been buried in the mound although not a scrap of timber remained. They exposed evidence of the ancient planking, and of row upon row of large iron bolts that had been used to secure the wooden planking together, Rows of bolts that lay in gently curing rows outwards from the vanished keel, and upwards from the vanished stern and from the upward curling bow of the vanished ship.
This remarkable find immediately raised the question of who had owned this ship in the mind of Alan Hassell. It was known from the time of Julius Caesar that the British, and their kinsmen in what are now the Breton and Normandy areas of France, used large iron bolts to secure the planks of their ocean going ships. The British had access to the largest iron ore deposits in Western Europe, in South East Wales in Glamorgan, before the Swedish irom ore resources were tapped in relatively modern times. Yet the Angles and Saxons used wooden dowels in their ships. This immediately raises the question of whether this ship that was buried in a grave mound was British or immigrant German Angle or Saxon.
As Alan Hassell points out the grave of King Ceri Longsword, who fought the Romans successfully from AD 52 to AD 74, is at the boat shaped mound at Nash Point as recorded in the Songs of the Graves. The boat shaped grave of King Meurig (My-Rig) the father of King Arthur II is inside a huge boat shaped mound and ditch enclosure on Mynydd y Gaer –Fortress Mountain. This grave mound is around 120 feet (37 meters) long and thirty feet (9 meters) wide. The Songs of the Graves identifies the site of the grave of Bedwyr ap Pedrog (Sir Bedievre) is also clearly boat shaped, and so on. This fact and other traceable evidence of recorded and known British boat shaped burials, raised questions in Alan Hassell’s mind.
He then noticed the remarkable reconstructed purse that was found in the Sutton Hoo ship burial. The leather had rotted away but the jewelled and ornamented parts of this purse remained intact and so restoration was possible. The immediate and plainly obvious fact was that there were representations that appeared to be of the widely known Gilgamesh figure clearly exhibited on this ancient purse. The Gilgamesh epic of the exploits of King Gilgamesh of the ancient city of Uruk,is the major epic story of ancient Mesopotamia and Syria and Asia Minor. This was not a story known to the Angles or the Saxons. There is however a Nordic ancient tale of being attacked by two gigantic wolves.
The animals that are shown attacking the human figures made up of jewels on the side of the purse do in fact appear to have manes. The animal that has a mane is a lion, and therefore it is quite a possibility that these jewelled animals are
depicting lions. The tails of these animals are also important as they are shown as long and curling. This would probably introduce the Bible story of Daniel being thrown into the lion’s den in Babylon. If this is the case then the attribution of the manufacture of this purse by a craftsman, and also the owner’s nationality as a Germanic Angle king is called into question. The human figure is not shown grasping the animals by the throat as is usually the case in the standard Gilgamesh representations.
Gold Purse Click to EnlargeThe Gilgamesh epic would have been known to our Chaldean-Hittite ancestors, who came into Britain and were led by Albyne around 1560 BC, and it would have been known to Trojan people in Western Asia Minor around 650 BC and later.
This again pointed to the fact that the Sutton Hoo ship burial as ancient British and not later German Angle or Saxon. The typical Gilgamesh representation is of a royal male figure standing with his arms outstretched and holding either a pair of lions, or bulls, or even rams, by their necks. The figure shown on the Suttoo Hoo purse is unmistakeably one that is involved with lions and that introduces the story of Daniel in the Lions Den, or that of the legendary founding King Gilgamesh.
Then Alan Hassell looked very closely at the set of golden spoons that were found in the Sutton Hoo ship, and the things that immediately caught his eye was the fact that these spoons had inscriptions cut into their long handles.
Equally important there is a very clear Christian Cross incised on the handle of each spoon immediately below the bowl, and before the lettering. Once again the known fact is that the Angles and Saxons were illiterates and it was not until King Alfred, the poor baker, sent messages to Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, for Geraint y Fardd Glas, for John Scottius, and for John Iregena, to introduce writing into his kingdom that literacy arrived in Anglo-Saxondom. Geraint was known in England as Asser, and he with John Scottius, and John Erigena, are the
Golden Spoons and Coelbren--Click to Enlargelegendary founders of University. As the golden spoons from Sutton Hoo clearly had a form of the Khumric Coelbren Alphabet cut into the handles it was already almost a impossibility for this ship burial to have been either Angle or Saxon pagan burial.
Alan Hassell who is an expert photographer then looked at another major Sutton Hoo relic. There is a remarkable ornamented golden bowl that was found in the Sutton Hoo ship burial. This bowl is very clearly decorated with ornamentation that shows what can best be described as a number of Maltese style Christian Crosses. These would indicate that it was a Christian person who was being buried, and this immediately raises the question of the race and nationality of that person.
There is however something that is even more remarkable as there is incised on the centre of the Sutton Hoo golden bowl, as plain for everyone to see there is the symbol known as the Star of David. This six-pointed star symbol In the centre of this Star of David symbol is an eight petal flower and this is a royal symbol
The Star of David 'embossed' found in many ancient Egyptian scenes. Set around inside the six points of the Star are six representations of Lilies and the Lily was an ancient royal emblem that was later used by the Frank-French Kings. Another symbol that appears outside and immediately between the outer points of the Star are six Doves, and again Doves are important symbols of Hebrew –Judean lore, and Doves were a bird that were a frequent sacrifice made to Israel’s God Jehovah.
To round matters off at this stage the remains of a distinctive shaped ‘lyre’ were found in the Sutton Hoo boat, and these pieces were successfully reconstructed to show how this musical instrument might have appeared. It seems that Khumric Wales is once again being located on the dark side of the moon as far as the British Museum is concerned. This Sutton Hoo ‘lyre’ just happens to be the same shape as the ancient Khumric ‘crwyth’ a guitar like musical instrument that was in use until fairly modern times.
It is no co-incidence that when white settlers first began moving into the mid west some 250 years ago they encountered a strange race of White people who were called the Mellungians. The late Jim Michael of Louisville took great interest in researches into these white Mellungian people remain an unsolved American mystery. The best theory that he and Alan Wilson came up with was that they were partly descended from the ancient Khumric migration into this area of North America, and that they might have been the people who contacted the survivors of the disastrous first English colony in North America, and possibly removed them into the interior in Kentucky and Tennessee.
The point here is that the Mellungians still make the same identical musical instrument as the ancient and recent Khumry made and used as their Crwyth. The dates of the lyres are Sutton Hoo around AD 630, the Khumry ‘Welsh’ from time immemorial to around AD 1800, and the Mellungians up to our present times. Exactly the same musical instrument, and one wonders if old King David and Solomon used the same musical instrument.
Just what a very clear six-pointed Star of David symbol doing set prominently in the very centre of the elaborate ornamentation of the golden bowl in the Sutton Hoo ship is a matter of huge interest. This design is harder to miss than it is to see. It the presence of this design that is peculiar to the Kings of Israel, is taken into account with all the other alleged “Anglo-Saxon” relics, records, and remains, then there is a substantial case to be made for a King who was descended from the tribe of Judah whose ancestors arrived in Britain around 504 –500 BC being the person whose monument this Sutton Hoo mound was. All the evidence points in this direction and it give substantial credence to the ages long belief that ancient Davidic Kings were in ancient Britain.
Perhaps it should be clearly stated that neither Alan Hassell, nor Alan Wilson, nor Baram Blackett, has any strong religious beliefs, and none of them are members of any religious organization or society. In fact all of them would have had a quiet laugh if this situation had been proposed to them before they began their investigations. There are however very serious people in Britain and Canada, and probably elsewhere, who firmly believe in a Davidic Link with ancient royalty in Britain.
Their detractors would do well to have a very quiet and very serious rethink.
There is also a magnificent metal helmet that was found in the great boat-burial at Sutton Hoo, and even that artefact is surprising. The Helmet has metal flaps that could be closed to cover the wearers face below the eyes, and the design shows a male person’s face with a moustache, but otherwise clean-shaven. The British were known to be clean-shaven apart from wearing moustaches, and the Angles and Saxons were bearded, and this helmet is major cultural evidence of an
incontrovertible nature. The signs are that the owner and wearer of the helmet was indisputably British and not Germanic.
The burial was that of a British King and we have his portrait to prove it. You only see things if you look for them and Alan Hassell very definitely looked at the Sutton Hoo treasures in the British Museum as well as many other things from
ancient Eastern Britain.
Once we again recognize our ancestral records then we can restore at least part of our ancient History. The archaeologists recognize two ancient cultural explosions of advanced skilled metal working people coming into Britain around 1600 and around 500 BC. The advent of these traceable metal-working cultures into Britain matches with the Historical records of the invasions of Albyne around 1560 BC and of Brutus around 500 BC. Yet the Historical Establishment blindly ignores all this archaeological evidence as if it did not exist.
This Star of David symbol may be of huge significance as there is definitely evidence that when the Assyrians deported huge numbers of Ten Tribe Israel known as the Khumry between 740 – 702 BC, they also deported numbers of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin. As the Khumry –Israel Ten Tribes are definitely provably the Khumry known as the Welsh -“walische” -from Old High German, it is logical that member of the Two Tribes of Judea also accompanied them into Britain. Khumric people lived mainly in the West of Britain, but there were Khumric Kings right through the Midlands of what is now England in Warwickshire and Leicestershire. One Khumric King of Leicestershire is recorded in the Brutus of England around AD 720.
So we have a Khumric or Davidic link with symbols plain for all to see on the Sutton Hoo golden bowl. We have straight stroke ancient British Coelbren writing incised on two gold spoons. We have a ship made with iron bolts in British fashion, and not in Anglo-Saxon fashion.
An attempt to try to read the short inscriptions on the handles of the two gold spoons found at Sutton Hoo was made by Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett. They did this because there is no apparent effort at decipherment into what is called
“Anglo-Saxon”.
Can you see the mixing of truth and lies..Totally intentionsl so as to accomplish/confirm today's Status Quo...an eventual peaceful compromise..Troedyrhiw
The short inscriptions appear to from read left to right starting from the spoon bowls and preceeded by the Christian Cross..One spoon appears to have either + CAU LLOC or CAW LLOC incised on the handle.
Click to Enlarge 
Click to Enlarge 
Click to Enlarge CAU means “enclosed”, and this could be in the sense of being “enclosed” in a protective manner.
Then: -
CAW means “a graduated bard”.
Then: -
LLOC basically means “a pen” or a “fold” (as in ‘a sheepfold’)
There are then several LLOC + words, and we have
1.“Lloches” meaning “shelter” or “refuge”.
Next there is: -
2.“Lochesu” meaning “to cherish” or “to shelter”.
Then there is: -
3. “Llochiad” meaning “protect”.
If these two spoons are sacred spoons that might have been used in an anointing of Coronation ceremony, then this may start to makesense.
The inscription on the second spoon appears to be either
+ NAU LOC or NAW LOC
incised on the handle and once again the fouth letter is difficult. There is a possibility that it is a ‘D’. Otherwise it suggests an ‘L’, or less likely a ‘LL’. So we may have NAW or otherwise NAWDD.
NAW means “kin”.
Then: -
“NAWDD” means ‘patronage’ or ‘protection’ or ‘support’.
Then: -OC means “from”, or “of”, or “out of”.
If these brief phrases can be construed as associated with a qualified person who is able to offer Shelter or Protection, or is to be a person offered some form of Christian Shelter or Protection, then it is quite possible that the golden spoons are part of the equipment required in some form of anointing ritual. The presence of a clear ChristianCross symbol on each spoon that preceeds the short inscription certainly points towards the spoons being used in Christian ceremonial occasions.
There are then two other strange designs on the Sutton Hoo purse made of gold and jewel stones. These designs show a large bird of prey attacking a duck(central image on purse), and anyone who has read the Khumric ‘Mabinogi’ solar and stellar stories will immediately recognize this scene as from the Mabinogi of Peredur -Steel Shirt, where Peredur sees a bird of prey kill a similar Duck and causes the red blood to flow and to mark the white snow on the ground. So just why is this British motif portrayed on the magnificent Sutton Hoo purse, if the Sutton Hoo burial allegedly was not British? Well done Mr Hassell.
Another matter that needed consideration was the existence of a corpus of ancient writings that had again been casually labelled as Anglo-Saxon despite the fact that these primitive tribes that had entered devastated depopulated Britain in chaos after the catastrophe of the impacts of debris from the passing comet of AD 562, were illiterates. Several of these surviving documents carry the name of the author (or copyist) and he was named as Caedmon, and Caedmon is a distinctly British name and definitely not an Angle or Saxon name.
Add to this the Khumric Welsh historical note that the language that finally prevailed in Lloegres, or Moon Country or England, was that of the Icinglas. It means that the Language that prevailed and eventually became English was the language of the Iceni Nation of Eastern England. The Iceni are probably best known through their Queen Boudicca –Boddicea, who led a major campaign against the Romans. Her final conflict with the Romans took place at Gop Paulini or Paulinus’ Gap in North East Wales where it appears that the Romans stood in a natural geographic gap position to avoid being outflanked by the superior numbers of the British Iceni nation. The largest battlefield grave mound in Britain marks the site, and a standing stone on a nearby hill is associated with the Queen Boudicca. If the language of the Iceni prevailed as the foundation or cornerstone of English, and the Iceni are descendants of the Albyne invasion of around 1560 BC then English is the oldest Language in Britain...
Sutton Hoo.. by Alan Wilson
Alan Hassell
If you read this carefully you will note that the Angles and the Saxons were Illiterate meaning they could not read or write.Then maybe someone can explain WHY THE so called historians and academics who appraised the new discovery claiming it was Saxon overlooked what appears to be writing on some of the finds.?
Why is it when they get taken to task they always find a way of getting things silenced? What happened to free speech we were guaranteed? Everyone is entitled to know the truth and if there are lies misinfornations if false information is given the public is entitled to know the truth. We have proved beyond reasonable doubt that the Sutton Hoo treasure is not Saxon.
Let the academics who claim it is prove beyond reasonable doubt that it is what they claim it to be show us the proof or own up to the lies deciets the establishment foist on us. We want our real history and we want in now even if it means you losing your lucrative overpaid jobs.
PART ONE...Here(new page)
*********************************************************************************
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/what-did-the-romans-ever-do-for-us-if-they-didnt-build-our-roads-2238592.html
Troedyrhiw.
Sutton Hoo...overlooking the River Deben in Suffolk England.
I swung Google Street Maps into action and attempted to have a peep at what may be offered to the visiting public....Alas no roads were available to the Google Street motor-cars that were carrying their 8 cameras...
Reminds one of China..What on earth would the English Trust Foundation be attempting to hide or possibly show to paying customers only..
No Public access roads to anywhere near to the excavation site..Begs a question that does.The Foundation needs another title.
Sutton Hoo...Suffolk EnglandTroedyrhiw
Such a long Walk..Brutus or London Stone..But well worth it..Click to enlargeBrutus or London Stone..I walk the full length of Cannon Street in London looking for this Mystical Stone knowing EXACTLY as to what I was looking for..I started by turning left onto Cannon Street...Traffic hid my side glances..Got very concerned when nothing appeared and I was reaching the East End of Cannon Street..I start back the way I came toward the street where I entered Cannon...JUST 20 YARDS PAST THAT STREET, after over an hour looking and dodging the traffic..I see The Stone in all its glory.My legs were not tired at all but my ass was as sore as hell.That is one of the Problems when you use Google Street Maps to find something :-)"
You see the Google marker showing its position at the REAR of Cannon Street..The DLM(Dynamic Little Man)is positioned in the Street,as he was designed to do..If he swings about 3 cameras(125deg) to his left he will observe a store named "London Stone"(See couple with red and blue top in front...zoom in)) facing onto Cannon Street..The Google marker is in the toilet of said store..at the bottom of the garden.
Hence,once again Google takes the rap.
Luckily..By good fortune, this happened in Cockney-land England where laughter and sound advice(any) is the order of the day..The Chinese would have immediately suspended their licence once again and demanded toilet training for all said Google Engineers involved in this "disturding" piece of "misinformation":-)).
References and Footnotes
Back to paragraph..
1..."Jewish quarter in Ludgate was stormed and materials"..Alan Hassell
See Gutenberg CHAPTER XXXVII
OLD JEWRY..HERE
Back to Image..
2.."RUINS OF THE BARBICAN ON LUDGATE HILL..Is this a sketch of centuries of abuse and neglect or the aftermath of the severe German bombings of London in this area ?..I DON'T KNOW,SO IT IS UP TO YOU IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THE 'TRUTH'
Back to the Llud image
3..Who are they?..."St Dunstan's is one of the Guild Churches in the City of London, built in 1831 following the destruction of the original church, which dated from around 1070"..."Restoration projects...We are fundraising to restore our organ, built in 1834".."We are also hoping to restore the statues of Queen Elizabeth and King Lud in our churchyard with the help of the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings."...To Help restore..see HERE
...
Back to Image..
4.."Trafalgar Square has 4 plinths (columns), three have historic statues on them and the fourth has been empty since 1841. For the past 8 years there has been a changing exhibition of different sculptures by contemporary artists, each on display for almost a year. These have included a coloured glass hotel, a marble torso (pictured), a clear resin cast of the plinth, and a tree. The proposals for the next round are on display and one of them is an eco sculpture by treehugger favourite Bob & Roberta Smith (who is actually one man). "
"Finalists for the fourth and last plinth in Trafalga Square....The artists are Allora & Calzadilla, Elmgreen & Dragset, Katharina Fritsch, Brian Griffiths, Hew Locke and Mariele Neudecker"..."The selected artist is due to be announced by the Mayor of London early next year, with the artwork they produce being installed after the current work, Nelson's Ship in a Bottle by Yinka Shonibare MBE has been taken down at the end of 2011" (grama aint two good is-it)
See... http://www.london.gov.uk/fourthplinth/
Troedyrhiw
If thee names of said 'artists' suggests anything ...it would be that we have
as finalists..two circus double acts or the pairs World Wrestling Nasties...a Half Soviet German from Hollywood??..A Welshman that changes his first name from Bran by introducing an "eye",followed by an Irishman that cannot spell his first name..The last and possible eventual winner is just the wife of old Red Doubledecker..the Mayor's personal chauffeur....and somewhere else on the site I find this little dosey "The 2011 Fourth Plinth Schools Awards are kindly supported by Guaranty Bank of Nigeria."
Note
The above was written by Alan some years ago.. Go here dated 11 March 2011 for an update as to why the Khumry(Welsh) battled with horse drawn chariots...Troedyrhiw
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
If its worth a comment,please think about it... good or bad...before you commit yourself.
<< Home